View Single Post
Old April 14th, 2008, 15:57   #36
PCL_128
Old Skool
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ATL
Posts: 4,685
Default Re: A return to regulation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris_Ford View Post
But does that mean that IAH-SHV will belong to XJT or CAL? Will ORD-DSM belong to UAL or SKW? Can XJT or SKW do that same route for another carrier instead?
The CAB would only recognize XJT as an individual airline on it's own branded flying. The flying that is done for CAL is done under the CO code. That means that CAL would be the one to apply to the CAB with an application for the route by using a code-share partner. If CAL maintained all of it's current routes, then XJT would also maintain all of its current CAL routes, because those routes are operated under CO code.

Quote:
So if re-regulation meant you would've been stuck at Gulfstream for 8 more years, would you be for it?
If deregulation had never taken place, people would be at the regionals a shorter amount of time because more mainline jobs would be available. Deregulation is the cause for the outsourcing nightmare.

Quote:
There's a reason pilots aren't management and methinks shortsightedness is it.
Most managements opposed deregulation.

Quote:
Why don't we worry about crewpass instead of re-regulating an industry that's working fine as it is.
Is that a joke? This industry is far from "fine as it is." We're in a tailspin.
__________________
Colgan ALPA - Vote!
PCL_128 is offline   Reply With Quote