View Single Post
Old March 8th, 2008, 12:43   #77
PCL_128
Old Skool
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: ATL
Posts: 4,122
Default Re: Southwest vs. the FAA

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyChicaga View Post
The point is, no airline is immune from pilots doing stupid things.
Yes, but airlines can reduce the risk by not rushing their pilots around all the time.

Quote:
Let me ask you this: If you saw FOQA data of a crew that swings gear at 300 feet and +200 knots, then takes the last [90-degree] turnoff on a 12,000 foot runway at 60 knots, would you feel that they had an unsafe culture?
I can't answer that question without knowing who it was. My opinion of SWA isn't based on a single accident, but on observations of their operation over a long period of time. The "hurry, hurry, hurry" mentality is a detriment to safety.

Quote:
Two accidents and one fatality in the history of the airline does not make an unsafe culture.
And it doesn't necessarily make a safe culture, either.

Quote:
They even have a section in their Flight Operations Manual dedicated to the importance of standardization, putting safety over on-time, and professionalism versus foolish pride.
Doesn't everyone have that section in their FOM? It's kind of a given. Doesn't really say anything about their airline. Pinnacle had a section in the FOM called the Guiding Principles. It talked about safety above all else, caring for the employees, etc... It was obviously complete bullsh--. We called it the "guideless principles."
__________________
I'm PCL_128, and I approved this message.
PCL_128 is offline   Reply With Quote