View Single Post
Old December 16th, 2007, 11:08   #134
RightSeatGirl
Senior Member
 
RightSeatGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Forever in search of the perfect Beer!
Posts: 477
Send a message via Yahoo to RightSeatGirl
Default Re: Stating the obviously unbovious

Quote:
Originally Posted by GalaxyIFE View Post
Y

Last thing and I'll shut up. Someone brought up the point about SWA requiring the 737 type...why is it that no one will call BS on this? You have to PAY for it to gain employment, right? How is this right?!?
Me thinks this policy is there because SWA really wants their pilots to have prior experience in the 737 vs a brand new type rating. They feel they have safer pilots that way. And that hiring policy sort of translates to: " Go get a job with another carrier to get your 737 type then talk to us in a couple of years." Me personally, I don't see a problem with that. There are lots of 737 operators, KHA, AirTran i.e. one can get on with that can get you the type rating without you paying for it on your own. These just are not low-time (less then 2500 hours) jobs.

I really don't see it as BS at all. I call it smart business. They save a ton of money on new-hire training. One more reason why they have been so successful. They just want pilots that have been in the business for a while and are coming there to work to retirement.
RightSeatGirl is offline   Reply With Quote