Thread: PSA Interview
View Single Post
Old November 22nd, 2007, 09:14   #24
flhrci
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 30
Default Re: PSA Interview

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtsu_av8er View Post
Welcome to JC, David.

before I jumpe down your throat, I want to make sure I got this right.

You're discouraged because you got turned down by an airline with 340 hours in airplanes?

Let's think about this:

You're not even qualified yet to fly as the Second in Command at a Part 135 company.

With regard to general aviation, you're probably not insurable in most high performance aircraft, cabin-class twins, or anything turbine.

You've probably never even seen the nasty side of a thunderstorm.

You probably have no idea what severe ice looks like from inside the airplane.

You've probably never shot an instrument approach NORDO, in IMC.

Now, come on - do you really think you should be discouraged because you got turned down? Even if there is a pilot shortage, should airlines lower the standards that much? Honestly, how much could you really offer the skipper when the crap gets nasty?
Thanks for the welcome, now on to the bitch session because apparently that is what this is now.

I know I have more to learn. I also know that I have more to offer than a brand new from scratch pilot straight out of ATP that just got his certificates within the last 90 days to include Private.

I am 36 years old. I am not an 18 year old kid that doesn't have a clue what responsibility is.

I have been a pilot since 1998.

I know that there are several regional airlines that ARE specifying minimums under 400 hours.

I know that the only thing I meant that is discouraging is that at least one airline I got turned down by says its minimums are one thing and then tells me something different via email. I didn't even get a chance.

I know that some of these airlines aren't telling applicants that they want transition/bridge training. If you can afford such training, it may only be good for one airline only and you may still not get hired.

I know that I spent a lot of money getting my instrument rating, and both commercial certificates over the last 4 months. I know I worked hard to get these certificates and all I want is a chance to learn and to prove myself. Apparently by your statements, I wasted my time.

I know I don't really want to work for the airlines and I would prefer something else. There is a really nice sounding pipeline patrol job available that pays good and would be good for time building. Haven't heard a peep. I would actually prefer to be a professional CFI as I have had the opportunity to teach in the past and enjoy it. But, I can't afford to get my CFI right now.

I know that a stupid bridge program costs upwards of $10000 more that I don't have to spend.

I know I am unemployed and need a job.

I know that even during the interview process that a perspective employer may not think I am good enough.

As for your part 135 SIC statement, there is at least one company I know of willing to hire low-time pilots, part 135 SIC allowing for time-building and will transition that person to left seat once the 135 minimums are met.

So let me see if I understand what you are saying. Apparently there is no way I can get any type of pilot job at my experience level. Apparently, I should give up and let everyone else applying get ahead of me. Apparently, I should just keep flying 172's until I get around 2000 hours or so like I would get the types of real world experience you are quoting.

My biggest point here is that we all have to start somewhere. Apparently you are a high-time, macho know it all pilot.

I will not give up! I am done defending myself here.

David
flhrci is offline   Reply With Quote