Quote:
Originally Posted by zmiller4  I don't mean to pry, but I remember in that other thread you said that the 200 turbine was as an SIC.
You said it was legitimate time, but with no other real explanation (and you're not going to get one--no airline will tell you why they didn't hire you) you have to wonder if ASA didn't consider your SIC King Air time as legit. If they didn't, it would explain a lot.
So, was the King Air SIC time under 135 that required 2 pilots? I can't think of another situation where an airline would consider it legit to log SIC in a single-pilot aircraft. If that was the problem, I'd just readjust the logbook, get some more time, and apply somewhere else. |
The KA300/350 do require two pilots IF your capt doesn't have a single pilot endorsement and IF the airplane is certified to hold more than 9 passengers which both the 300 I flew and 350 I now fly do, so the time is legit. AND even if they threw out all of my KA time, I still have 200hrs of PIC multi in barons plus enough TT to still be considered. If that was the case they should say hey we aren't going to accept this and then I would say ok...well take it away, I still have enough time.
And as far as a current employee walking it in, I did not have it but evidently I got a good word from a management person for me....