View Single Post
Old October 14th, 2006, 13:26   #30
jtrain609
Old Skool
 
jtrain609's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Park City, UT
Posts: 12,898
Send a message via ICQ to jtrain609 Send a message via AIM to jtrain609
Default Re: " . . . As Fire Rains Down Over Manhattan"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Champcar View Post
The Cirrus is a good stable platform and is easier to fly than a 172. They have good stall characteristics. The chute is a safety feature that has saved lifes that would have been lost and it is up to the pilot to when they want to use it so get your heads around that. If you havn't flown one then ####.
How about if you don't know why the chute was installed then ####. Cirrus saying that their chute was there as an additional safety feature is marketing BS, they killed their chief test pilot during spin testing because he couldn't get out of a spin. If the lead test pilot on the program, who had had more hours in the Cirrus then you do thinking about airplanes, then what makes you think YOU could get out of a spin in a Cirrus hot shot?
jtrain609 is offline   Reply With Quote