Thread: Climb gradients
View Single Post
Old July 24th, 2006, 16:29   #6
fish314
Senior Member
 
fish314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: (CBM) Columbus AFB, MS
Posts: 1,314
Send a message via AIM to fish314
Default Re: Climb gradients

Quote:
Originally Posted by saxman66
The reason I get 16:1 climb gradient is because that is what is displayed on Airnav.com's airport runway information. It'll say slope to clear the trees on the end of the runway is 16:1 or whatever. But yes, feet per nm is much easier.
If you are ever trying to convert it, just divide 6080 by the first number (16, for example). Why 6080? Because that's how many feet are in a nautical mile.

So 6080/16=380. Therefore 16:1=380ft/NM

And if you are trying to convert the other way (from ft/NM to climb gradient as a ratio) it's the same thing. Divide 6080 by the ft to climb per nautical mile.

So 6080/380=16. 380ft/NM=16:1
__________________
Dude, what are you trying to do? Land the airplane or adjust the field elevation?
fish314 is offline   Reply With Quote