jetcareers - View Single Post

FL270 · November 9th, 2004, 16:02

[ QUOTE ]
May have been severe, in their eyes....

[/ QUOTE ]I don't think anybody is arguing that, Lloyd. However, the definition of severe turbulence is not really subjective, nor based on aircraft size or pilot experience. It is objectively defined to apply to all aircraft regardless of size ... see the relevant quote from Doug above.

Again, as has been said, who reported it and where? If it was a light aircraft, you may have the subjectivity issue to deal with. Even if it is in the airspace of a major air carrier airport (ATL, etc.), the surrounding airspace is full of bug-smashers at a variety of altitudes. If it is a hub, you should have reports from multiple aircraft to rely on in making a judgment call. Ultimately, of course, one's best judgment (ensuring compliance with company policy) is the trump card here.

November 9th, 2004, 16:02	#10
FL270 Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Charlotte, NC Posts: 1,101	Re: Severe Turbulence [ QUOTE ] May have been severe, in their eyes.... [/ QUOTE ]I don't think anybody is arguing that, Lloyd. However, the definition of severe turbulence is not really subjective, nor based on aircraft size or pilot experience. It is objectively defined to apply to all aircraft regardless of size ... see the relevant quote from Doug above. Again, as has been said, who reported it and where? If it was a light aircraft, you may have the subjectivity issue to deal with. Even if it is in the airspace of a major air carrier airport (ATL, etc.), the surrounding airspace is full of bug-smashers at a variety of altitudes. If it is a hub, you should have reports from multiple aircraft to rely on in making a judgment call. Ultimately, of course, one's best judgment (ensuring compliance with company policy) is the trump card here.