jetcareers - View Single Post

MikeD · October 2nd, 2004, 19:31

[ QUOTE ]
Ahhh, good tip, thanks.

I don't see anything in Part 91 requiring a notification, but the AIM passage was a little ambiguous.

[/ QUOTE ]

And you're right, the passage is somewhat ambiguous in terms of why some controllers would welcome it, others be annoyed by it.....especially if it is intended to be a required call.

October 2nd, 2004, 19:31	#4
MikeD Administrator Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Pinal Airpark Posts: 6,897	Re: Holding reporting requirements [ QUOTE ] Ahhh, good tip, thanks. I don't see anything in Part 91 requiring a notification, but the AIM passage was a little ambiguous. [/ QUOTE ] And you're right, the passage is somewhat ambiguous in terms of why some controllers would welcome it, others be annoyed by it.....especially if it is intended to be a required call.