View Single Post
Old November 3rd, 2009, 18:12   #65
TFaudree_ERAU
Old Skool
 
TFaudree_ERAU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: How ya durrin
Posts: 3,410
Send a message via AIM to TFaudree_ERAU
Default Re: Flying entire life without AFD

Quote:
Originally Posted by mojo6911 View Post
So runway length on a sectional chart or TPP isn't legal? Also, the airport diagram on Airnav comes directly from NACO.

http://204.108.4.16/d-tpp/0911/06039AD.PDF
Just because there is 5000' of pavement doesn't necessarily mean that all 5000' of it is available in your take off calculations. See below.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhugz View Post
Can you reference that for me?
Quote:
Originally Posted by aevfo View Post
So you are saying that a 10-9 is not a legal source for t/o and landing distances?
Take a look at Naples, FL (KAPF). Runway 14/32 to be specific. The 10-9 doesn't show anything about a limit to the runway distance for take off. Naturally, one would assume that all 5000' is available.


However, if you dig into the A/FD, you will find that the published ASDA (Accelerate-Stop Distance Available) for runway 14 is 4,550' and for runway 32 it is 4,870'. The limiting factor for take off performance calculations for Part 25 aircraft is the shortest of the Take Off Runway Available (TORA), Take Off Distance Available (TODA) or the ASDA.



Old standards required only a 200' Runway Safety Area (RSA) past the end of the runway. In keeping up with ICAO standards, the FAA now requires a minimum of 1000'. What that means is that if there is an obstacle 500' off the end of a 5000' runway, your ASDA is reduced to 4,500'. Again, you can't find this information anywhere other than the A/FD.

Last edited by TFaudree_ERAU; November 3rd, 2009 at 18:15. Reason: defined RSA
TFaudree_ERAU is offline   Reply With Quote